Discover » Where a New Chicago Law Firm’s First Clients Actually Come From

Where a New Chicago Law Firm’s First Clients Actually Come From

An attorney who left a mid-sized firm to go out on her own told me she’d spent her first three weeks building a website.

She had a logo, a practice area page, a contact form, and a plan to start posting on LinkedIn. What she did not have was a client, and she was starting to worry about it.

I asked who knew she’d left.

There was a pause. She’d told her family and two close friends. She hadn’t told the twenty-odd attorneys she’d worked alongside for nine years, because — and this is the part I’ve heard a dozen times — she wanted to have everything in place first. The website, the firm name, the professional presentation. She didn’t want to announce before she looked ready.

By the time she did tell them, she’d lost six weeks.

Her first four clients came from three of those former colleagues. Not one came from the website.

In full disclosure: Amata provides a marketing service to our clients, so I have an interest in you thinking about this. Which is why I want to be straight about when marketing actually matters, and it isn’t month one.

Where do a new law firm’s first clients come from?

From people who already know you. Former colleagues, opposing counsel who respected how you handled a matter, past clients, and attorneys in practice areas adjacent to yours who get calls they can’t take. Almost never from a website in the first six months.

That isn’t an argument against having a website. It’s an argument about sequence.

The work you do in month one is telling people. The work that pays off in month twelve is marketing. Doing them in the wrong order costs you the first quarter.

Why do referrals dominate early?

Because hiring a lawyer is a high-trust decision made rarely, and most people solve it by asking someone they trust rather than searching. A person who needs an attorney asks a friend, an accountant, or another lawyer. Search usually comes later, to check out a name they’ve already been given.

That shapes what works.

If your name reaches someone through a person they trust, you’re being recommended. If it reaches them through a search result, you’re being compared. The first is a far shorter conversation.

It also explains why the first clients arrive faster than anyone expects, once people know. Your former colleagues have been turning away conflicts and small matters for years. The moment they know where to send them, some arrive.

Who should you tell, and how?

Everyone who has seen your work. Former colleagues first, then opposing counsel, then past clients where you’re permitted, then every attorney you know in an adjacent practice area. The message is one sentence about what you’re doing and what you take.

Do it before you feel ready. This is the single most common mistake and it costs the most.

Attorneys delay the announcement until the website is live, the logo is right, and the letterhead is printed — because announcing feels like asking, and asking feels better when you look established. But the people who matter here already know whether you’re good. They worked with you. They don’t need the website to decide.

What to actually say. You’ve started your own firm, here’s the practice area, here’s where you are, and you’d welcome anything that doesn’t fit where they are. That’s it. No pitch, no brochure.

And be specific about what you take. “Anything you’ve got” produces nothing. “Employment matters under about $250,000, and I’ll take the conflicts you can’t” produces a referral, because you’ve made the decision easy.

What about the Chicago legal community?

Chicago’s bar is smaller than it looks, and the paths into it are well worn. The Chicago Bar Association’s committees meet regularly and are genuinely open. The Illinois State Bar’s sections do the same. Both run solo and small firm programming.

Committee membership works where general networking doesn’t, because you see the same people repeatedly. Referrals require familiarity, and familiarity requires repetition. A single event produces nothing. A committee you attend for a year produces relationships.

There’s also the question of where you work. An attorney in a spare bedroom has no colleagues. An attorney in a building with other attorneys has people who hear about a case over coffee and remember it three weeks later when a conflict comes in. That’s not a marketing channel anyone can measure, and it’s how a meaningful share of work moves in this city.

When does marketing actually start mattering?

Around the time your network’s capacity to refer runs out, which for most practices is somewhere in the first year. Your former colleagues have a finite number of conflicts. Once you’ve absorbed those, growth has to come from people who don’t know you.

That’s when a website earns its keep, and when the rest of it — search, content, a Google Business Profile, directory presence — starts returning something.

Doing that work earlier isn’t wasted, since it takes months to produce results and the groundwork has to be laid. But treating it as the first priority is how attorneys spend month one on a logo instead of on the twenty people who could send them a case next week.

The Marketing Lab exists for the second phase. Our clients get it at no additional fee, and it is deliberately not the answer to “how do I get my first client.”

What doesn’t work early?

Paid search, directory subscriptions, and anything sold to you as lead generation in your first quarter. Not because these never work, but because they’re expensive, slow to tune, and compete against firms with years of data and budget you don’t have.

Avvo, Martindale, Justia and FindLaw all sell premium placements. Some practices get real value from them eventually. None of them beats a former colleague picking up the phone.

Be particularly careful with anyone selling exclusive leads in your first six months. You have no baseline, no way to judge quality, and no leverage. Wait until you know what a client is worth to you.

Frequently asked questions

From people who already know your work — former colleagues, opposing counsel, past clients where permitted, and attorneys in adjacent practice areas who receive calls they cannot take. Almost never from a website in the first six months, regardless of how good the website is.

One sentence about what you are doing and what you take, sent to everyone who has seen your work. Do it before you feel ready. Attorneys routinely delay the announcement until a website and logo are finished, and that delay costs weeks of referrals.

Be specific. “Anything you’ve got” produces nothing, because it asks the other person to do the thinking. Naming a practice area, a rough matter size, and a willingness to take conflicts makes the referral decision easy and produces actual calls.

Around the point where your existing network’s capacity to refer is exhausted, typically within the first year. Groundwork can begin earlier since search takes months to produce results, but treating marketing as the month-one priority displaces the work that actually produces early clients.

Eventually, yes. Not urgently. A website matters when people who do not know you start looking you up, which happens after referrals have carried the early months. Build it, but do not let building it delay telling people you have launched.

Through repetition rather than through events. Chicago Bar Association and Illinois State Bar committees meet regularly and are generally open to join. Referrals require familiarity, and familiarity requires seeing the same people repeatedly, which no single networking event can produce.

Paid search, premium directory placements, and purchased leads in the first quarter. These are expensive, slow to tune, and compete against firms with years of data. Without a baseline you cannot judge lead quality or what a client is worth to you.

Often faster than expected once people know. Former colleagues have been turning away conflicts and smaller matters for years, and some arrive as soon as they know where to send them. The delay is almost always in the telling, not in the responding.

Six weeks

I think about that attorney’s six weeks fairly often, because the mistake was so reasonable.

She wasn’t lazy or avoiding the work. She was doing what felt like the professional thing — getting her house in order before announcing herself. Every instinct she’d built in nine years at a firm told her that you don’t present something unfinished.

But the people she needed to tell weren’t evaluating her presentation. They’d sat across a table from her. They already knew what she could do, and the only new information she had to give them was an address and a sentence about what she wanted.

That took one email. She spent six weeks on a website instead.

If you’re about to do this, write that email first. Before the logo, before the site, before the business cards. It is the highest-return hour of work in the entire launch, and it costs nothing.

Questions about any of this? 312.924.0200 or [email protected].

Ron Bockstahler is the founder and CEO of Amata Law Office Suites, a vendor member of the Chicago Bar Association, supporting Chicago-area law firms since 2002. He co-hosts The 1958 Lawyer podcast.

Amata Law Office Suites is not a law firm and does not provide legal services to the general public. This article is general information, not legal or marketing advice. Attorneys should confirm that any client communication complies with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rules 7.1 through 7.3 on communications and solicitation.

From Amata

Want help putting this to work?

This piece supports a bigger conversation about running your practice.

Discover Amata →